Patent
US 9,893,199reduced and N-doped graphene oxide
solvents (water, ethanol, DMF, DMSO, THF, acetone)
Figure 2 is a graph illustrating the C/O atomic ratio and the C/N atomic ratio according to the reaction temperature of the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides of prepared in Examples 1 ~ 5 and Comparative Examples 1 ~ 5 and the conventional 20 graphene oxide;
Figure 3 is a graph illustrating the atomic percentage of graphitic C and oxidized C in the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Example 1 ~ 5;
Figure 4 is a graph illustrating the result of X- ray diffraction analysis performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6 and the conventional graphene oxide; 5
Figure 5 is a graph illustrating the result of Raman spectroscopy performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6;
Figure 5 is a graph illustrating the result of Raman spectroscopy performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6;
Figure 6 is a graph illustrating the result of X- 10 ray photoelectron spectroscopy performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6;
Figure 7 is a graph illustrating the I D/IG rati o of the 15 reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6 and the conventional graphene oxide; and
Figure 9 are graphs illustrating the performance of the field effect transistors prepared in Examples 7 and 8.
Figure 9 are graphs illustrating the performance of the field effect transistors prepared in Examples 7 and 8.
C/O atomic ratio range (claim 9, preferred) | 3–8 atomic ratio | reduced and N-doped graphene oxide |
C/N atomic ratio range (claim 9, preferred) | 12–16 atomic ratio | reduced and N-doped graphene oxide |
Duration | ≥ 1 hour | — |
reduced and N-doped graphene oxide
solvents (water, ethanol, DMF, DMSO, THF, acetone)
Figure 2 is a graph illustrating the C/O atomic ratio and the C/N atomic ratio according to the reaction temperature of the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides of prepared in Examples 1 ~ 5 and Comparative Examples 1 ~ 5 and the conventional 20 graphene oxide;
Figure 3 is a graph illustrating the atomic percentage of graphitic C and oxidized C in the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Example 1 ~ 5;
Figure 4 is a graph illustrating the result of X- ray diffraction analysis performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6 and the conventional graphene oxide; 5
Figure 5 is a graph illustrating the result of Raman spectroscopy performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6;
Figure 5 is a graph illustrating the result of Raman spectroscopy performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6;
Figure 6 is a graph illustrating the result of X- 10 ray photoelectron spectroscopy performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6;
Figure 7 is a graph illustrating the I D/IG rati o of the 15 reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6 and the conventional graphene oxide; and
Figure 9 are graphs illustrating the performance of the field effect transistors prepared in Examples 7 and 8.
Figure 9 are graphs illustrating the performance of the field effect transistors prepared in Examples 7 and 8.
C/O atomic ratio range (claim 9, preferred) | 3–8 atomic ratio | reduced and N-doped graphene oxide |
C/N atomic ratio range (claim 9, preferred) | 12–16 atomic ratio | reduced and N-doped graphene oxide |
Duration | ≥ 1 hour | — |
reduced and N-doped graphene oxide
solvents (water, ethanol, DMF, DMSO, THF, acetone)
Figure 2 is a graph illustrating the C/O atomic ratio and the C/N atomic ratio according to the reaction temperature of the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides of prepared in Examples 1 ~ 5 and Comparative Examples 1 ~ 5 and the conventional 20 graphene oxide;
Figure 3 is a graph illustrating the atomic percentage of graphitic C and oxidized C in the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Example 1 ~ 5;
Figure 4 is a graph illustrating the result of X- ray diffraction analysis performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6 and the conventional graphene oxide; 5
Figure 5 is a graph illustrating the result of Raman spectroscopy performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6;
Figure 5 is a graph illustrating the result of Raman spectroscopy performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6;
Figure 6 is a graph illustrating the result of X- 10 ray photoelectron spectroscopy performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6;
Figure 7 is a graph illustrating the I D/IG rati o of the 15 reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6 and the conventional graphene oxide; and
Figure 9 are graphs illustrating the performance of the field effect transistors prepared in Examples 7 and 8.
Figure 9 are graphs illustrating the performance of the field effect transistors prepared in Examples 7 and 8.
C/O atomic ratio range (claim 9, preferred) | 3–8 atomic ratio | reduced and N-doped graphene oxide |
C/N atomic ratio range (claim 9, preferred) | 12–16 atomic ratio | reduced and N-doped graphene oxide |
Duration | ≥ 1 hour | — |
reduced and N-doped graphene oxide
solvents (water, ethanol, DMF, DMSO, THF, acetone)
Figure 2 is a graph illustrating the C/O atomic ratio and the C/N atomic ratio according to the reaction temperature of the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides of prepared in Examples 1 ~ 5 and Comparative Examples 1 ~ 5 and the conventional 20 graphene oxide;
Figure 3 is a graph illustrating the atomic percentage of graphitic C and oxidized C in the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Example 1 ~ 5;
Figure 4 is a graph illustrating the result of X- ray diffraction analysis performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6 and the conventional graphene oxide; 5
Figure 5 is a graph illustrating the result of Raman spectroscopy performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6;
Figure 5 is a graph illustrating the result of Raman spectroscopy performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6;
Figure 6 is a graph illustrating the result of X- 10 ray photoelectron spectroscopy performed to analyze the reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6;
Figure 7 is a graph illustrating the I D/IG rati o of the 15 reduced and N-doped graphene oxides prepared in Examples 5 and 6 and the conventional graphene oxide; and
Figure 9 are graphs illustrating the performance of the field effect transistors prepared in Examples 7 and 8.
Figure 9 are graphs illustrating the performance of the field effect transistors prepared in Examples 7 and 8.
C/O atomic ratio range (claim 9, preferred) | 3–8 atomic ratio | reduced and N-doped graphene oxide |
C/N atomic ratio range (claim 9, preferred) | 12–16 atomic ratio | reduced and N-doped graphene oxide |
Duration | ≥ 1 hour | — |