Matter42
  • Vision
Sign in

Matter42 Atlas

  • Atlas Metrology
  • Atlas Physics AI

Resources

  • Security
  • FAQ
  • Documentation
  • Python SDK

Company

  • Team
  • Careers
  • Blog
Vision
Sign in
Atlas Metrology/XRD

XRD analysis, from scan session to structure

Atlas covers the full XRD workflow: importing a multi-scan session with its geometry intact, phase identification, crystallite size and strain, texture, rocking-curve mosaic, φ-scan rotated domains, and pattern simulation for planning a measurement. Each result comes with its failure modes spelled out.

See a full walkthrough
Loading figure…
Two-component rocking-curve fit on a WS₂ film from a synthetic validation fixture: a 431 arcsec coherent core plus a diffuse shoulder carrying 46 % of the intensity, selected by BIC. Reporting only the narrow width would make the film look more uniform than the full curve supports.
How Atlas produced this result

What Atlas does with XRD data

Every analysis runs as a documented Block with recorded parameters, so the same result can be reproduced, reviewed, and compared across samples.

  • Scan geometry stays attached

    Multi-scan Bruker archives are split into typed datasets that keep their driven and fixed axes, anode, and wavelengths. Counts are stored exactly as measured.

  • Phase identification you can inspect

    Every cataloged candidate is ranked with per-reflection detail, texture-redistributed intensities do not reject the right phase, and peaks no candidate explains are flagged instead of disappearing into a residual.

  • Size and strain with their caveats

    Crystallite size, microstrain, and lattice strain from multiple reflections, reported with the instrument-broadening assumptions that decide whether they are quantitative.

  • Texture is not epitaxy

    Lotgering F, Harris coefficients, and March–Dollase r measure out-of-plane orientation. Rocking curves and φ scans measure mosaic and in-plane registry, and Atlas never treats them as interchangeable.

  • Rocking curves and rotated domains

    Two-component rocking-curve fits separate a coherent core from diffuse mosaic, and φ scans report the fraction of 60°-rotated domains without splitting peaks at the 0°/360° seam.

  • Simulate before you measure

    Simulate a reference pattern with crystallite broadening and texture to choose a scan window, or check that two expected phases have separable lines before booking instrument time.

Atlas compared with legacy XRD software

Most labs already own capable XRD software. This is where Atlas adds to it, and where your existing tools are still the better choice.

X-ray diffraction: Matter42 Atlas compared with instrument vendor software and desktop analysis tools
CapabilityMatter42 AtlasCloud or private deploymentInstrument vendor softwaree.g. HighScore, DIFFRAC.EVA, SmartLab StudioDesktop analysis toolse.g. JADE, GSAS-II, Match!
Phase search–match

Partly supported. Ranked matching against 11 cataloged film, substrate, and precursor phases.

Supported. Search–match against large reference databases.

Supported. Search–match against large reference databases.

Rietveld refinement

Not supported. Not offered.

Supported. Available, often as an add-on.

Supported. Core feature of dedicated codes.

Texture metrics (Lotgering, Harris, March–Dollase)

Supported. All three, computed and labeled by what they measure.

Partly supported. In some packages, or through refinement.

Partly supported. Through refinement or scripts.

Rocking-curve decomposition

Supported. Two-component fit with model selection; dislocation estimate labeled as screening.

Partly supported. In dedicated high-resolution modules.

Partly supported. Generic peak fitting.

φ scans and rotated-domain fraction

Supported. Periodic peak detection and twin fraction.

Partly supported. In dedicated epitaxy modules.

Not supported. Manual.

Checks for scan-geometry mistakes

Supported. Warns when, say, a φ scan is sent to a rocking-curve analysis.

Partly supported. Analyst’s responsibility.

Partly supported. Analyst’s responsibility.

File formats

Partly supported. Bruker .brml natively; XY and CSV exports.

Supported. Own formats plus common exchange formats.

Supported. Most common formats.

Results tied to samples and process history

Supported. Lattice, texture, rocking widths, and twin fractions are stored as structured outputs linked to the file, parameters, sample, and process run.

Partly supported. Project files on the workstation; sample context kept separately.

Partly supported. Saved project files; sample context kept by hand.

Instrument control and acquisition

Not supported. Not an acquisition tool. Keep your instrument software for this.

Supported. Core purpose.

Not supported. Not offered.

  • Supported
  • Partly supported
  • Not supported

Reflects typical, publicly documented workflows in each category as of September 2026. Capabilities vary by product, version, and add-on module. Product names are trademarks of their respective owners.

Where Atlas stops

A result is only useful if you know its limits. These are the current boundaries, stated in the product the same way.

  • Atlas does not run Rietveld refinement, and phase identification covers a focused 11-phase catalog rather than an exhaustive database. Keep your current software for full structure refinement and unknown-phase searches.
  • A Scherrer size is not treated as quantitative without an instrument standard.
  • Epitaxy is never declared from a θ–2θ scan, and a c-axis expansion is reported without guessing the chemistry behind it.
  • A Dunn–Koch dislocation density is labeled as a screening number, not a dislocation count.

Files Atlas reads

  • Bruker DIFFRAC .brml, including multi-scan archives
  • Two-column XY and CSV exports

Analysis Blocks

  • XRD peak finder
  • Identify phase
  • Analyze texture quality
  • Analyze rocking curve
  • Analyze φ scan

Worked examples

  • Technical walkthrough · 14 min read

    Beyond peak picking: what Atlas can do with XRD

    A practical tour from broad-peak GIXRD and multi-scan BRML files to phase evidence, strain, texture, rocking curves, and rotational twins.

Questions

Does Atlas replace HighScore, DIFFRAC, or TOPAS?
Not for structure refinement: Atlas does not run Rietveld refinement. It is built for the thin-film questions around it, such as texture, mosaic spread, in-plane registry, and run-to-run drift, and it keeps those results linked to each deposition run.
Can I use files from a Rigaku or Malvern Panalytical diffractometer?
Bruker .brml archives are parsed natively with their scan geometry. Data from other diffractometers can be loaded as two-column XY or CSV exports, with the scan geometry set explicitly.
Which phase database does Atlas use?
A focused catalog of 11 phases: the 2H TMDs (MoS₂, WS₂, WSe₂, MoSe₂), graphite, h-BN, common substrates (Si, quartz, sapphire), and the CVD precursor oxides MoO₃ and WO₃. Peaks no candidate explains are flagged as possible impurities. For unknown materials outside that set, use a full reference database.

Other techniques

  • Raman spectroscopy
  • Photoluminescence spectroscopy
  • X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
  • Atomic force microscopy

Bring your XRD data

Send us a file from your own instrument. We’ll run it through Atlas and walk you through every number and caveat it reports.

All techniques
Matter42

A world model for your materials: know what you made and decide what to make next, with the evidence attached.

Platform

  • Atlas Metrology
  • Atlas Physics AI
  • Literature

Software

  • Raman analysis
  • PL analysis
  • XPS analysis
  • XRD analysis
  • AFM analysis

Company

  • Vision
  • Team
  • Careers
  • Blog

Resources

  • Documentation
  • Python SDK
  • Security and deployment
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Social

  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2026 Matter42. All rights reserved.

Matter42
  • Vision
Sign in

Matter42 Atlas

  • Atlas Metrology
  • Atlas Physics AI

Resources

  • Security
  • FAQ
  • Documentation
  • Python SDK

Company

  • Team
  • Careers
  • Blog
Vision
Sign in
Atlas Metrology/XRD

XRD analysis, from scan session to structure

Atlas covers the full XRD workflow: importing a multi-scan session with its geometry intact, phase identification, crystallite size and strain, texture, rocking-curve mosaic, φ-scan rotated domains, and pattern simulation for planning a measurement. Each result comes with its failure modes spelled out.

See a full walkthrough
Loading figure…
Two-component rocking-curve fit on a WS₂ film from a synthetic validation fixture: a 431 arcsec coherent core plus a diffuse shoulder carrying 46 % of the intensity, selected by BIC. Reporting only the narrow width would make the film look more uniform than the full curve supports.
How Atlas produced this result

What Atlas does with XRD data

Every analysis runs as a documented Block with recorded parameters, so the same result can be reproduced, reviewed, and compared across samples.

  • Scan geometry stays attached

    Multi-scan Bruker archives are split into typed datasets that keep their driven and fixed axes, anode, and wavelengths. Counts are stored exactly as measured.

  • Phase identification you can inspect

    Every cataloged candidate is ranked with per-reflection detail, texture-redistributed intensities do not reject the right phase, and peaks no candidate explains are flagged instead of disappearing into a residual.

  • Size and strain with their caveats

    Crystallite size, microstrain, and lattice strain from multiple reflections, reported with the instrument-broadening assumptions that decide whether they are quantitative.

  • Texture is not epitaxy

    Lotgering F, Harris coefficients, and March–Dollase r measure out-of-plane orientation. Rocking curves and φ scans measure mosaic and in-plane registry, and Atlas never treats them as interchangeable.

  • Rocking curves and rotated domains

    Two-component rocking-curve fits separate a coherent core from diffuse mosaic, and φ scans report the fraction of 60°-rotated domains without splitting peaks at the 0°/360° seam.

  • Simulate before you measure

    Simulate a reference pattern with crystallite broadening and texture to choose a scan window, or check that two expected phases have separable lines before booking instrument time.

Atlas compared with legacy XRD software

Most labs already own capable XRD software. This is where Atlas adds to it, and where your existing tools are still the better choice.

X-ray diffraction: Matter42 Atlas compared with instrument vendor software and desktop analysis tools
CapabilityMatter42 AtlasCloud or private deploymentInstrument vendor softwaree.g. HighScore, DIFFRAC.EVA, SmartLab StudioDesktop analysis toolse.g. JADE, GSAS-II, Match!
Phase search–match

Partly supported. Ranked matching against 11 cataloged film, substrate, and precursor phases.

Supported. Search–match against large reference databases.

Supported. Search–match against large reference databases.

Rietveld refinement

Not supported. Not offered.

Supported. Available, often as an add-on.

Supported. Core feature of dedicated codes.

Texture metrics (Lotgering, Harris, March–Dollase)

Supported. All three, computed and labeled by what they measure.

Partly supported. In some packages, or through refinement.

Partly supported. Through refinement or scripts.

Rocking-curve decomposition

Supported. Two-component fit with model selection; dislocation estimate labeled as screening.

Partly supported. In dedicated high-resolution modules.

Partly supported. Generic peak fitting.

φ scans and rotated-domain fraction

Supported. Periodic peak detection and twin fraction.

Partly supported. In dedicated epitaxy modules.

Not supported. Manual.

Checks for scan-geometry mistakes

Supported. Warns when, say, a φ scan is sent to a rocking-curve analysis.

Partly supported. Analyst’s responsibility.

Partly supported. Analyst’s responsibility.

File formats

Partly supported. Bruker .brml natively; XY and CSV exports.

Supported. Own formats plus common exchange formats.

Supported. Most common formats.

Results tied to samples and process history

Supported. Lattice, texture, rocking widths, and twin fractions are stored as structured outputs linked to the file, parameters, sample, and process run.

Partly supported. Project files on the workstation; sample context kept separately.

Partly supported. Saved project files; sample context kept by hand.

Instrument control and acquisition

Not supported. Not an acquisition tool. Keep your instrument software for this.

Supported. Core purpose.

Not supported. Not offered.

  • Supported
  • Partly supported
  • Not supported

Reflects typical, publicly documented workflows in each category as of September 2026. Capabilities vary by product, version, and add-on module. Product names are trademarks of their respective owners.

Where Atlas stops

A result is only useful if you know its limits. These are the current boundaries, stated in the product the same way.

  • Atlas does not run Rietveld refinement, and phase identification covers a focused 11-phase catalog rather than an exhaustive database. Keep your current software for full structure refinement and unknown-phase searches.
  • A Scherrer size is not treated as quantitative without an instrument standard.
  • Epitaxy is never declared from a θ–2θ scan, and a c-axis expansion is reported without guessing the chemistry behind it.
  • A Dunn–Koch dislocation density is labeled as a screening number, not a dislocation count.

Files Atlas reads

  • Bruker DIFFRAC .brml, including multi-scan archives
  • Two-column XY and CSV exports

Analysis Blocks

  • XRD peak finder
  • Identify phase
  • Analyze texture quality
  • Analyze rocking curve
  • Analyze φ scan

Worked examples

  • Technical walkthrough · 14 min read

    Beyond peak picking: what Atlas can do with XRD

    A practical tour from broad-peak GIXRD and multi-scan BRML files to phase evidence, strain, texture, rocking curves, and rotational twins.

Questions

Does Atlas replace HighScore, DIFFRAC, or TOPAS?
Not for structure refinement: Atlas does not run Rietveld refinement. It is built for the thin-film questions around it, such as texture, mosaic spread, in-plane registry, and run-to-run drift, and it keeps those results linked to each deposition run.
Can I use files from a Rigaku or Malvern Panalytical diffractometer?
Bruker .brml archives are parsed natively with their scan geometry. Data from other diffractometers can be loaded as two-column XY or CSV exports, with the scan geometry set explicitly.
Which phase database does Atlas use?
A focused catalog of 11 phases: the 2H TMDs (MoS₂, WS₂, WSe₂, MoSe₂), graphite, h-BN, common substrates (Si, quartz, sapphire), and the CVD precursor oxides MoO₃ and WO₃. Peaks no candidate explains are flagged as possible impurities. For unknown materials outside that set, use a full reference database.

Other techniques

  • Raman spectroscopy
  • Photoluminescence spectroscopy
  • X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
  • Atomic force microscopy

Bring your XRD data

Send us a file from your own instrument. We’ll run it through Atlas and walk you through every number and caveat it reports.

All techniques
Matter42

A world model for your materials: know what you made and decide what to make next, with the evidence attached.

Platform

  • Atlas Metrology
  • Atlas Physics AI
  • Literature

Software

  • Raman analysis
  • PL analysis
  • XPS analysis
  • XRD analysis
  • AFM analysis

Company

  • Vision
  • Team
  • Careers
  • Blog

Resources

  • Documentation
  • Python SDK
  • Security and deployment
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Social

  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2026 Matter42. All rights reserved.

Matter42
  • Vision
Sign in

Matter42 Atlas

  • Atlas Metrology
  • Atlas Physics AI

Resources

  • Security
  • FAQ
  • Documentation
  • Python SDK

Company

  • Team
  • Careers
  • Blog
Vision
Sign in
Atlas Metrology/XRD

XRD analysis, from scan session to structure

Atlas covers the full XRD workflow: importing a multi-scan session with its geometry intact, phase identification, crystallite size and strain, texture, rocking-curve mosaic, φ-scan rotated domains, and pattern simulation for planning a measurement. Each result comes with its failure modes spelled out.

See a full walkthrough
Loading figure…
Two-component rocking-curve fit on a WS₂ film from a synthetic validation fixture: a 431 arcsec coherent core plus a diffuse shoulder carrying 46 % of the intensity, selected by BIC. Reporting only the narrow width would make the film look more uniform than the full curve supports.
How Atlas produced this result

What Atlas does with XRD data

Every analysis runs as a documented Block with recorded parameters, so the same result can be reproduced, reviewed, and compared across samples.

  • Scan geometry stays attached

    Multi-scan Bruker archives are split into typed datasets that keep their driven and fixed axes, anode, and wavelengths. Counts are stored exactly as measured.

  • Phase identification you can inspect

    Every cataloged candidate is ranked with per-reflection detail, texture-redistributed intensities do not reject the right phase, and peaks no candidate explains are flagged instead of disappearing into a residual.

  • Size and strain with their caveats

    Crystallite size, microstrain, and lattice strain from multiple reflections, reported with the instrument-broadening assumptions that decide whether they are quantitative.

  • Texture is not epitaxy

    Lotgering F, Harris coefficients, and March–Dollase r measure out-of-plane orientation. Rocking curves and φ scans measure mosaic and in-plane registry, and Atlas never treats them as interchangeable.

  • Rocking curves and rotated domains

    Two-component rocking-curve fits separate a coherent core from diffuse mosaic, and φ scans report the fraction of 60°-rotated domains without splitting peaks at the 0°/360° seam.

  • Simulate before you measure

    Simulate a reference pattern with crystallite broadening and texture to choose a scan window, or check that two expected phases have separable lines before booking instrument time.

Atlas compared with legacy XRD software

Most labs already own capable XRD software. This is where Atlas adds to it, and where your existing tools are still the better choice.

X-ray diffraction: Matter42 Atlas compared with instrument vendor software and desktop analysis tools
CapabilityMatter42 AtlasCloud or private deploymentInstrument vendor softwaree.g. HighScore, DIFFRAC.EVA, SmartLab StudioDesktop analysis toolse.g. JADE, GSAS-II, Match!
Phase search–match

Partly supported. Ranked matching against 11 cataloged film, substrate, and precursor phases.

Supported. Search–match against large reference databases.

Supported. Search–match against large reference databases.

Rietveld refinement

Not supported. Not offered.

Supported. Available, often as an add-on.

Supported. Core feature of dedicated codes.

Texture metrics (Lotgering, Harris, March–Dollase)

Supported. All three, computed and labeled by what they measure.

Partly supported. In some packages, or through refinement.

Partly supported. Through refinement or scripts.

Rocking-curve decomposition

Supported. Two-component fit with model selection; dislocation estimate labeled as screening.

Partly supported. In dedicated high-resolution modules.

Partly supported. Generic peak fitting.

φ scans and rotated-domain fraction

Supported. Periodic peak detection and twin fraction.

Partly supported. In dedicated epitaxy modules.

Not supported. Manual.

Checks for scan-geometry mistakes

Supported. Warns when, say, a φ scan is sent to a rocking-curve analysis.

Partly supported. Analyst’s responsibility.

Partly supported. Analyst’s responsibility.

File formats

Partly supported. Bruker .brml natively; XY and CSV exports.

Supported. Own formats plus common exchange formats.

Supported. Most common formats.

Results tied to samples and process history

Supported. Lattice, texture, rocking widths, and twin fractions are stored as structured outputs linked to the file, parameters, sample, and process run.

Partly supported. Project files on the workstation; sample context kept separately.

Partly supported. Saved project files; sample context kept by hand.

Instrument control and acquisition

Not supported. Not an acquisition tool. Keep your instrument software for this.

Supported. Core purpose.

Not supported. Not offered.

  • Supported
  • Partly supported
  • Not supported

Reflects typical, publicly documented workflows in each category as of September 2026. Capabilities vary by product, version, and add-on module. Product names are trademarks of their respective owners.

Where Atlas stops

A result is only useful if you know its limits. These are the current boundaries, stated in the product the same way.

  • Atlas does not run Rietveld refinement, and phase identification covers a focused 11-phase catalog rather than an exhaustive database. Keep your current software for full structure refinement and unknown-phase searches.
  • A Scherrer size is not treated as quantitative without an instrument standard.
  • Epitaxy is never declared from a θ–2θ scan, and a c-axis expansion is reported without guessing the chemistry behind it.
  • A Dunn–Koch dislocation density is labeled as a screening number, not a dislocation count.

Files Atlas reads

  • Bruker DIFFRAC .brml, including multi-scan archives
  • Two-column XY and CSV exports

Analysis Blocks

  • XRD peak finder
  • Identify phase
  • Analyze texture quality
  • Analyze rocking curve
  • Analyze φ scan

Worked examples

  • Technical walkthrough · 14 min read

    Beyond peak picking: what Atlas can do with XRD

    A practical tour from broad-peak GIXRD and multi-scan BRML files to phase evidence, strain, texture, rocking curves, and rotational twins.

Questions

Does Atlas replace HighScore, DIFFRAC, or TOPAS?
Not for structure refinement: Atlas does not run Rietveld refinement. It is built for the thin-film questions around it, such as texture, mosaic spread, in-plane registry, and run-to-run drift, and it keeps those results linked to each deposition run.
Can I use files from a Rigaku or Malvern Panalytical diffractometer?
Bruker .brml archives are parsed natively with their scan geometry. Data from other diffractometers can be loaded as two-column XY or CSV exports, with the scan geometry set explicitly.
Which phase database does Atlas use?
A focused catalog of 11 phases: the 2H TMDs (MoS₂, WS₂, WSe₂, MoSe₂), graphite, h-BN, common substrates (Si, quartz, sapphire), and the CVD precursor oxides MoO₃ and WO₃. Peaks no candidate explains are flagged as possible impurities. For unknown materials outside that set, use a full reference database.

Other techniques

  • Raman spectroscopy
  • Photoluminescence spectroscopy
  • X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
  • Atomic force microscopy

Bring your XRD data

Send us a file from your own instrument. We’ll run it through Atlas and walk you through every number and caveat it reports.

All techniques
Matter42

A world model for your materials: know what you made and decide what to make next, with the evidence attached.

Platform

  • Atlas Metrology
  • Atlas Physics AI
  • Literature

Software

  • Raman analysis
  • PL analysis
  • XPS analysis
  • XRD analysis
  • AFM analysis

Company

  • Vision
  • Team
  • Careers
  • Blog

Resources

  • Documentation
  • Python SDK
  • Security and deployment
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Social

  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2026 Matter42. All rights reserved.

Matter42
  • Vision
Sign in

Matter42 Atlas

  • Atlas Metrology
  • Atlas Physics AI

Resources

  • Security
  • FAQ
  • Documentation
  • Python SDK

Company

  • Team
  • Careers
  • Blog
Vision
Sign in
Atlas Metrology/XRD

XRD analysis, from scan session to structure

Atlas covers the full XRD workflow: importing a multi-scan session with its geometry intact, phase identification, crystallite size and strain, texture, rocking-curve mosaic, φ-scan rotated domains, and pattern simulation for planning a measurement. Each result comes with its failure modes spelled out.

See a full walkthrough
Loading figure…
Two-component rocking-curve fit on a WS₂ film from a synthetic validation fixture: a 431 arcsec coherent core plus a diffuse shoulder carrying 46 % of the intensity, selected by BIC. Reporting only the narrow width would make the film look more uniform than the full curve supports.
How Atlas produced this result

What Atlas does with XRD data

Every analysis runs as a documented Block with recorded parameters, so the same result can be reproduced, reviewed, and compared across samples.

  • Scan geometry stays attached

    Multi-scan Bruker archives are split into typed datasets that keep their driven and fixed axes, anode, and wavelengths. Counts are stored exactly as measured.

  • Phase identification you can inspect

    Every cataloged candidate is ranked with per-reflection detail, texture-redistributed intensities do not reject the right phase, and peaks no candidate explains are flagged instead of disappearing into a residual.

  • Size and strain with their caveats

    Crystallite size, microstrain, and lattice strain from multiple reflections, reported with the instrument-broadening assumptions that decide whether they are quantitative.

  • Texture is not epitaxy

    Lotgering F, Harris coefficients, and March–Dollase r measure out-of-plane orientation. Rocking curves and φ scans measure mosaic and in-plane registry, and Atlas never treats them as interchangeable.

  • Rocking curves and rotated domains

    Two-component rocking-curve fits separate a coherent core from diffuse mosaic, and φ scans report the fraction of 60°-rotated domains without splitting peaks at the 0°/360° seam.

  • Simulate before you measure

    Simulate a reference pattern with crystallite broadening and texture to choose a scan window, or check that two expected phases have separable lines before booking instrument time.

Atlas compared with legacy XRD software

Most labs already own capable XRD software. This is where Atlas adds to it, and where your existing tools are still the better choice.

X-ray diffraction: Matter42 Atlas compared with instrument vendor software and desktop analysis tools
CapabilityMatter42 AtlasCloud or private deploymentInstrument vendor softwaree.g. HighScore, DIFFRAC.EVA, SmartLab StudioDesktop analysis toolse.g. JADE, GSAS-II, Match!
Phase search–match

Partly supported. Ranked matching against 11 cataloged film, substrate, and precursor phases.

Supported. Search–match against large reference databases.

Supported. Search–match against large reference databases.

Rietveld refinement

Not supported. Not offered.

Supported. Available, often as an add-on.

Supported. Core feature of dedicated codes.

Texture metrics (Lotgering, Harris, March–Dollase)

Supported. All three, computed and labeled by what they measure.

Partly supported. In some packages, or through refinement.

Partly supported. Through refinement or scripts.

Rocking-curve decomposition

Supported. Two-component fit with model selection; dislocation estimate labeled as screening.

Partly supported. In dedicated high-resolution modules.

Partly supported. Generic peak fitting.

φ scans and rotated-domain fraction

Supported. Periodic peak detection and twin fraction.

Partly supported. In dedicated epitaxy modules.

Not supported. Manual.

Checks for scan-geometry mistakes

Supported. Warns when, say, a φ scan is sent to a rocking-curve analysis.

Partly supported. Analyst’s responsibility.

Partly supported. Analyst’s responsibility.

File formats

Partly supported. Bruker .brml natively; XY and CSV exports.

Supported. Own formats plus common exchange formats.

Supported. Most common formats.

Results tied to samples and process history

Supported. Lattice, texture, rocking widths, and twin fractions are stored as structured outputs linked to the file, parameters, sample, and process run.

Partly supported. Project files on the workstation; sample context kept separately.

Partly supported. Saved project files; sample context kept by hand.

Instrument control and acquisition

Not supported. Not an acquisition tool. Keep your instrument software for this.

Supported. Core purpose.

Not supported. Not offered.

  • Supported
  • Partly supported
  • Not supported

Reflects typical, publicly documented workflows in each category as of September 2026. Capabilities vary by product, version, and add-on module. Product names are trademarks of their respective owners.

Where Atlas stops

A result is only useful if you know its limits. These are the current boundaries, stated in the product the same way.

  • Atlas does not run Rietveld refinement, and phase identification covers a focused 11-phase catalog rather than an exhaustive database. Keep your current software for full structure refinement and unknown-phase searches.
  • A Scherrer size is not treated as quantitative without an instrument standard.
  • Epitaxy is never declared from a θ–2θ scan, and a c-axis expansion is reported without guessing the chemistry behind it.
  • A Dunn–Koch dislocation density is labeled as a screening number, not a dislocation count.

Files Atlas reads

  • Bruker DIFFRAC .brml, including multi-scan archives
  • Two-column XY and CSV exports

Analysis Blocks

  • XRD peak finder
  • Identify phase
  • Analyze texture quality
  • Analyze rocking curve
  • Analyze φ scan

Worked examples

  • Technical walkthrough · 14 min read

    Beyond peak picking: what Atlas can do with XRD

    A practical tour from broad-peak GIXRD and multi-scan BRML files to phase evidence, strain, texture, rocking curves, and rotational twins.

Questions

Does Atlas replace HighScore, DIFFRAC, or TOPAS?
Not for structure refinement: Atlas does not run Rietveld refinement. It is built for the thin-film questions around it, such as texture, mosaic spread, in-plane registry, and run-to-run drift, and it keeps those results linked to each deposition run.
Can I use files from a Rigaku or Malvern Panalytical diffractometer?
Bruker .brml archives are parsed natively with their scan geometry. Data from other diffractometers can be loaded as two-column XY or CSV exports, with the scan geometry set explicitly.
Which phase database does Atlas use?
A focused catalog of 11 phases: the 2H TMDs (MoS₂, WS₂, WSe₂, MoSe₂), graphite, h-BN, common substrates (Si, quartz, sapphire), and the CVD precursor oxides MoO₃ and WO₃. Peaks no candidate explains are flagged as possible impurities. For unknown materials outside that set, use a full reference database.

Other techniques

  • Raman spectroscopy
  • Photoluminescence spectroscopy
  • X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
  • Atomic force microscopy

Bring your XRD data

Send us a file from your own instrument. We’ll run it through Atlas and walk you through every number and caveat it reports.

All techniques
Matter42

A world model for your materials: know what you made and decide what to make next, with the evidence attached.

Platform

  • Atlas Metrology
  • Atlas Physics AI
  • Literature

Software

  • Raman analysis
  • PL analysis
  • XPS analysis
  • XRD analysis
  • AFM analysis

Company

  • Vision
  • Team
  • Careers
  • Blog

Resources

  • Documentation
  • Python SDK
  • Security and deployment
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Social

  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2026 Matter42. All rights reserved.