Patent
MoSe₂
WS₂
WSe₂
n-butyllithium in hexane
Figure 2 shows characterization of M o S 2 NSs. (a) TEM image of as-synthesized M oS 2 nanosheet. (b) HAADF TEM image of (a) M o S 2 nanosheet showing that there are no defects in it. (c) Raman spectrum collected from the M o S 2 nanosheet and bulk M o S 2. The peak difference (~1 8 cm-) of E 2 g …
Figure 3 shows characterization of holey M o S 2 NSs. (a) STEM image of the as-synthesized Mo S 2 NSs showing no defects in it. (b) HRTEM image of a M o S 2 NS, floating on water after the deposition process, with holes. (c) STEM image of the same showing clear holes on a single NS. (d) HAADF STEM …
Figure 4 shows anti-bacterial performance of holey M o S 2 NSs. The antibacterial activity of the porous M o S 2 NSs, with Mo-rich edges is compared with bulk M o S 2, bulk M o S 2 with the same amount of Ag used for drilling, M o S 2 NSs without holes and holey M o S 2 NSs in dark. In all the …
Figure 6 shows antibacterial performance of holey M o S 2. (a-c) Photograph of the antibacterial activity (with Bacillus subtilis bacteria) of M o S 2 NSs shown in (b) and with holey M o S 2 shown in (c). (a) Input bacterial concentration and (d) comparison of antibacterial activity of M o S 2 NSs …
| 10⁵ times higher |
MoS₂ |
Raman E2g peak position of MoS2 NSs | 387 cm⁻¹ | MoS₂ |
Raman A1g peak position of MoS2 NSs | 409 cm⁻¹ | MoS₂ |
Thickness | 3–5 nm | — |
Thickness | ≤ 20 nm | — |
MoSe₂
WS₂
WSe₂
n-butyllithium in hexane
Figure 2 shows characterization of M o S 2 NSs. (a) TEM image of as-synthesized M oS 2 nanosheet. (b) HAADF TEM image of (a) M o S 2 nanosheet showing that there are no defects in it. (c) Raman spectrum collected from the M o S 2 nanosheet and bulk M o S 2. The peak difference (~1 8 cm-) of E 2 g …
Figure 3 shows characterization of holey M o S 2 NSs. (a) STEM image of the as-synthesized Mo S 2 NSs showing no defects in it. (b) HRTEM image of a M o S 2 NS, floating on water after the deposition process, with holes. (c) STEM image of the same showing clear holes on a single NS. (d) HAADF STEM …
Figure 4 shows anti-bacterial performance of holey M o S 2 NSs. The antibacterial activity of the porous M o S 2 NSs, with Mo-rich edges is compared with bulk M o S 2, bulk M o S 2 with the same amount of Ag used for drilling, M o S 2 NSs without holes and holey M o S 2 NSs in dark. In all the …
Figure 6 shows antibacterial performance of holey M o S 2. (a-c) Photograph of the antibacterial activity (with Bacillus subtilis bacteria) of M o S 2 NSs shown in (b) and with holey M o S 2 shown in (c). (a) Input bacterial concentration and (d) comparison of antibacterial activity of M o S 2 NSs …
| 10⁵ times higher |
MoS₂ |
Raman E2g peak position of MoS2 NSs | 387 cm⁻¹ | MoS₂ |
Raman A1g peak position of MoS2 NSs | 409 cm⁻¹ | MoS₂ |
Thickness | 3–5 nm | — |
Thickness | ≤ 20 nm | — |
MoSe₂
WS₂
WSe₂
n-butyllithium in hexane
Figure 2 shows characterization of M o S 2 NSs. (a) TEM image of as-synthesized M oS 2 nanosheet. (b) HAADF TEM image of (a) M o S 2 nanosheet showing that there are no defects in it. (c) Raman spectrum collected from the M o S 2 nanosheet and bulk M o S 2. The peak difference (~1 8 cm-) of E 2 g …
Figure 3 shows characterization of holey M o S 2 NSs. (a) STEM image of the as-synthesized Mo S 2 NSs showing no defects in it. (b) HRTEM image of a M o S 2 NS, floating on water after the deposition process, with holes. (c) STEM image of the same showing clear holes on a single NS. (d) HAADF STEM …
Figure 4 shows anti-bacterial performance of holey M o S 2 NSs. The antibacterial activity of the porous M o S 2 NSs, with Mo-rich edges is compared with bulk M o S 2, bulk M o S 2 with the same amount of Ag used for drilling, M o S 2 NSs without holes and holey M o S 2 NSs in dark. In all the …
Figure 6 shows antibacterial performance of holey M o S 2. (a-c) Photograph of the antibacterial activity (with Bacillus subtilis bacteria) of M o S 2 NSs shown in (b) and with holey M o S 2 shown in (c). (a) Input bacterial concentration and (d) comparison of antibacterial activity of M o S 2 NSs …
| 10⁵ times higher |
MoS₂ |
Raman E2g peak position of MoS2 NSs | 387 cm⁻¹ | MoS₂ |
Raman A1g peak position of MoS2 NSs | 409 cm⁻¹ | MoS₂ |
Thickness | 3–5 nm | — |
Thickness | ≤ 20 nm | — |
MoSe₂
WS₂
WSe₂
n-butyllithium in hexane
Figure 2 shows characterization of M o S 2 NSs. (a) TEM image of as-synthesized M oS 2 nanosheet. (b) HAADF TEM image of (a) M o S 2 nanosheet showing that there are no defects in it. (c) Raman spectrum collected from the M o S 2 nanosheet and bulk M o S 2. The peak difference (~1 8 cm-) of E 2 g …
Figure 3 shows characterization of holey M o S 2 NSs. (a) STEM image of the as-synthesized Mo S 2 NSs showing no defects in it. (b) HRTEM image of a M o S 2 NS, floating on water after the deposition process, with holes. (c) STEM image of the same showing clear holes on a single NS. (d) HAADF STEM …
Figure 4 shows anti-bacterial performance of holey M o S 2 NSs. The antibacterial activity of the porous M o S 2 NSs, with Mo-rich edges is compared with bulk M o S 2, bulk M o S 2 with the same amount of Ag used for drilling, M o S 2 NSs without holes and holey M o S 2 NSs in dark. In all the …
Figure 6 shows antibacterial performance of holey M o S 2. (a-c) Photograph of the antibacterial activity (with Bacillus subtilis bacteria) of M o S 2 NSs shown in (b) and with holey M o S 2 shown in (c). (a) Input bacterial concentration and (d) comparison of antibacterial activity of M o S 2 NSs …
| 10⁵ times higher |
MoS₂ |
Raman E2g peak position of MoS2 NSs | 387 cm⁻¹ | MoS₂ |
Raman A1g peak position of MoS2 NSs | 409 cm⁻¹ | MoS₂ |
Thickness | 3–5 nm | — |
Thickness | ≤ 20 nm | — |