Research paper
WorkflowHigh Throughput ScreeningIdentifying Dust-lane Spheroidal Galaxies in DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys Using Semi-Supervised Methods
Zhijian Luo, Jianzhen Chen, Wenxiang Pei, Hubing Xiao et al.
Each sample groups how it was prepared, characterized, and measured. Click a card to expand.
No measurements recorded
4 properties
4 properties
| Type | Label | Value | Material | Sample | Condition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification Recall | GC-SWGAN recall | 87% | — | |||
| Classification Accuracy | GC-SWGAN accuracy | 84% | — | |||
| Classification F1 Score | GC-SWGAN F₁ score | 86% | — | |||
| Class Fraction | DLSG fraction in test set | 3.7% | — | |||
| Candidate Count | dust-lane ETG candidates | 9482 | — | |||
| Candidate Count | galaxies screened | 310000 | — | |||
| Color Comparison | photometric color trend | redder g-r | — | |||
| Specific Star Formation Rate Comparison | specific star formation rate trend | higher | — |
Each sample groups how it was prepared, characterized, and measured. Click a card to expand.
No measurements recorded
4 properties
4 properties
| Type | Label | Value | Material | Sample | Condition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification Recall | GC-SWGAN recall | 87% | — | |||
| Classification Accuracy | GC-SWGAN accuracy | 84% | — | |||
| Classification F1 Score | GC-SWGAN F₁ score | 86% | — | |||
| Class Fraction | DLSG fraction in test set | 3.7% | — | |||
| Candidate Count | dust-lane ETG candidates | 9482 | — | |||
| Candidate Count | galaxies screened | 310000 | — | |||
| Color Comparison | photometric color trend | redder g-r | — | |||
| Specific Star Formation Rate Comparison | specific star formation rate trend | higher | — |
Each sample groups how it was prepared, characterized, and measured. Click a card to expand.
No measurements recorded
4 properties
4 properties
| Type | Label | Value | Material | Sample | Condition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification Recall | GC-SWGAN recall | 87% | — | |||
| Classification Accuracy | GC-SWGAN accuracy | 84% | — | |||
| Classification F1 Score | GC-SWGAN F₁ score | 86% | — | |||
| Class Fraction | DLSG fraction in test set | 3.7% | — | |||
| Candidate Count | dust-lane ETG candidates | 9482 | — | |||
| Candidate Count | galaxies screened | 310000 | — | |||
| Color Comparison | photometric color trend | redder g-r | — | |||
| Specific Star Formation Rate Comparison | specific star formation rate trend | higher | — |
Each sample groups how it was prepared, characterized, and measured. Click a card to expand.
No measurements recorded
4 properties
4 properties
| Type | Label | Value | Material | Sample | Condition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification Recall | GC-SWGAN recall | 87% | — | |||
| Classification Accuracy | GC-SWGAN accuracy | 84% | — | |||
| Classification F1 Score | GC-SWGAN F₁ score | 86% | — | |||
| Class Fraction | DLSG fraction in test set | 3.7% | — | |||
| Candidate Count | dust-lane ETG candidates | 9482 | — | |||
| Candidate Count | galaxies screened | 310000 | — | |||
| Color Comparison | photometric color trend | redder g-r | — | |||
| Specific Star Formation Rate Comparison | specific star formation rate trend | higher | — |