Research paper
Experimental CharacterizationComputational DFT| Type | Label | Value | Material | Sample | Condition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transport Conductivity Change | in-plane electronic conductivity drop at hydrogenation transition | 4ordersofmagnitude | — | |||
| Charge Neutrality Point | NP | -0.35V | — | |||
| Proton Transport Current Ratio | electron-doped vs hole-doped proton current enhancement | 30 | — | |||
| Proton Transport Current Ratio | proton current relative to limiting electrolyte conductivity | 5 | — | |||
| Proton Transport Current Threshold Field | high-field regime where transport traces the limiting current | 0.5V nm⁻¹ | — | — | ||
| Estimated Adsorbed Hydrogen Density | H atom density inferred from Raman D band | 1000000000000000cm⁻² | — | |||
| Capacitance | electrolyte capacitance | 20uF/cm² | — |
| Type | Label | Value | Material | Sample | Condition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transport Conductivity Change | in-plane electronic conductivity drop at hydrogenation transition | 4ordersofmagnitude | — | |||
| Charge Neutrality Point | NP | -0.35V | — | |||
| Proton Transport Current Ratio | electron-doped vs hole-doped proton current enhancement | 30 | — | |||
| Proton Transport Current Ratio | proton current relative to limiting electrolyte conductivity | 5 | — | |||
| Proton Transport Current Threshold Field | high-field regime where transport traces the limiting current | 0.5V nm⁻¹ | — | — | ||
| Estimated Adsorbed Hydrogen Density | H atom density inferred from Raman D band | 1000000000000000cm⁻² | — | |||
| Capacitance | electrolyte capacitance | 20uF/cm² | — |
| Type | Label | Value | Material | Sample | Condition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transport Conductivity Change | in-plane electronic conductivity drop at hydrogenation transition | 4ordersofmagnitude | — | |||
| Charge Neutrality Point | NP | -0.35V | — | |||
| Proton Transport Current Ratio | electron-doped vs hole-doped proton current enhancement | 30 | — | |||
| Proton Transport Current Ratio | proton current relative to limiting electrolyte conductivity | 5 | — | |||
| Proton Transport Current Threshold Field | high-field regime where transport traces the limiting current | 0.5V nm⁻¹ | — | — | ||
| Estimated Adsorbed Hydrogen Density | H atom density inferred from Raman D band | 1000000000000000cm⁻² | — | |||
| Capacitance | electrolyte capacitance | 20uF/cm² | — |
| Type | Label | Value | Material | Sample | Condition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transport Conductivity Change | in-plane electronic conductivity drop at hydrogenation transition | 4ordersofmagnitude | — | |||
| Charge Neutrality Point | NP | -0.35V | — | |||
| Proton Transport Current Ratio | electron-doped vs hole-doped proton current enhancement | 30 | — | |||
| Proton Transport Current Ratio | proton current relative to limiting electrolyte conductivity | 5 | — | |||
| Proton Transport Current Threshold Field | high-field regime where transport traces the limiting current | 0.5V nm⁻¹ | — | — | ||
| Estimated Adsorbed Hydrogen Density | H atom density inferred from Raman D band | 1000000000000000cm⁻² | — | |||
| Capacitance | electrolyte capacitance | 20uF/cm² | — |