Patent
US 10,044,031porous polypropylene separator (Celgard 3501)
n-methyl, n-butyl pyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide
LiTFSI
PEGDME
carbon black
polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF)
aluminum substrate
sulfur
S
Figure 2A illustrates a transmission electron microscope (TEM) bright field (BF) image.
Figure 3B shows the carbon K-edge absorption spectra according to one embodiment.
Figure 4D illustrates reversible capacity vs. current density according to an embodiment.
Figure 6A illustrates a SEM image for pure GO according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 6B illustrates another SEM image for pure GO according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7A illustrates a SEM image of the as-prepared GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7B illustrates another SEM image of the as-prepared GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7C illustrates a TEM image for GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7D illustrates another TEM image for GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 8 illustrates X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of GO-S nanocomposites before (a) and after heat treatment in Ar environment for 12h at different temperatures of (b) 155 0 C, and (c) 160 0 C according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 9 illustrates attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) spectra of GO according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 11 illustrates S L-edge soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) spectrum of GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 155 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 12 illustrates fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of (a) GO, and (b) GO-S nanocomposites according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 13 illustrates X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of (a) GO, (b) S element, and (c) GO-S according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 14 illustrates cycling performance of GO-S nanocomposite cathode at a constant rate of 0.05C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention
Figure 16 illustrates a cycling performance of GO-S nanocomposite cathode at a constant rate of 0.1 C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17A illustrates a SEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17B illustrates another SEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17C illustrates a TEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17D illustrates another TEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 18C illustrates cycling performance of GO-S nanocomposite cathode at a constant current rate of 0. 1 C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 18D illustrates reversible capacity vs. current density (rate capability) for GO-S nanocomposite cathode. All the cells were cycled in the potential window from 1.0 to 3.0 V according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 19 illustrates cycling performance of a pure GO cathode at a constant rate of 0. 1C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention.
Sulfur Content Wt Pct |
| 66 wt% |
graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Discharge Capacity Initial | 1320 mAh g-1 | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Coulombic Efficiency | 96.4 % | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Discharge Capacity Second Cycle | 1247 mAh g-1 | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Coulombic Efficiency | 97.5 % | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Capacity Retention | 94.5 % | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
C-O stretching vibration | 1751 cm⁻¹ | graphene oxide |
C-OH stretching vibration | 1751 cm⁻¹ | graphene oxide |
C=O stretching vibration (carbonyl/carboxylic groups) | 1751 cm⁻¹ | graphene oxide |
Voltage | 1–3.6 V | — |
Voltage | 1–3 V | — |
— | ≤ 0.01 eV | — |
porous polypropylene separator (Celgard 3501)
n-methyl, n-butyl pyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide
LiTFSI
PEGDME
carbon black
polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF)
aluminum substrate
sulfur
S
Figure 2A illustrates a transmission electron microscope (TEM) bright field (BF) image.
Figure 3B shows the carbon K-edge absorption spectra according to one embodiment.
Figure 4D illustrates reversible capacity vs. current density according to an embodiment.
Figure 6A illustrates a SEM image for pure GO according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 6B illustrates another SEM image for pure GO according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7A illustrates a SEM image of the as-prepared GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7B illustrates another SEM image of the as-prepared GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7C illustrates a TEM image for GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7D illustrates another TEM image for GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 8 illustrates X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of GO-S nanocomposites before (a) and after heat treatment in Ar environment for 12h at different temperatures of (b) 155 0 C, and (c) 160 0 C according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 9 illustrates attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) spectra of GO according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 11 illustrates S L-edge soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) spectrum of GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 155 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 12 illustrates fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of (a) GO, and (b) GO-S nanocomposites according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 13 illustrates X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of (a) GO, (b) S element, and (c) GO-S according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 14 illustrates cycling performance of GO-S nanocomposite cathode at a constant rate of 0.05C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention
Figure 16 illustrates a cycling performance of GO-S nanocomposite cathode at a constant rate of 0.1 C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17A illustrates a SEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17B illustrates another SEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17C illustrates a TEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17D illustrates another TEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 18C illustrates cycling performance of GO-S nanocomposite cathode at a constant current rate of 0. 1 C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 18D illustrates reversible capacity vs. current density (rate capability) for GO-S nanocomposite cathode. All the cells were cycled in the potential window from 1.0 to 3.0 V according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 19 illustrates cycling performance of a pure GO cathode at a constant rate of 0. 1C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention.
Sulfur Content Wt Pct |
| 66 wt% |
graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Discharge Capacity Initial | 1320 mAh g-1 | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Coulombic Efficiency | 96.4 % | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Discharge Capacity Second Cycle | 1247 mAh g-1 | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Coulombic Efficiency | 97.5 % | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Capacity Retention | 94.5 % | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
C-O stretching vibration | 1751 cm⁻¹ | graphene oxide |
C-OH stretching vibration | 1751 cm⁻¹ | graphene oxide |
C=O stretching vibration (carbonyl/carboxylic groups) | 1751 cm⁻¹ | graphene oxide |
Voltage | 1–3.6 V | — |
Voltage | 1–3 V | — |
— | ≤ 0.01 eV | — |
porous polypropylene separator (Celgard 3501)
n-methyl, n-butyl pyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide
LiTFSI
PEGDME
carbon black
polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF)
aluminum substrate
sulfur
S
Figure 2A illustrates a transmission electron microscope (TEM) bright field (BF) image.
Figure 3B shows the carbon K-edge absorption spectra according to one embodiment.
Figure 4D illustrates reversible capacity vs. current density according to an embodiment.
Figure 6A illustrates a SEM image for pure GO according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 6B illustrates another SEM image for pure GO according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7A illustrates a SEM image of the as-prepared GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7B illustrates another SEM image of the as-prepared GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7C illustrates a TEM image for GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7D illustrates another TEM image for GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 8 illustrates X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of GO-S nanocomposites before (a) and after heat treatment in Ar environment for 12h at different temperatures of (b) 155 0 C, and (c) 160 0 C according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 9 illustrates attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) spectra of GO according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 11 illustrates S L-edge soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) spectrum of GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 155 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 12 illustrates fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of (a) GO, and (b) GO-S nanocomposites according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 13 illustrates X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of (a) GO, (b) S element, and (c) GO-S according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 14 illustrates cycling performance of GO-S nanocomposite cathode at a constant rate of 0.05C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention
Figure 16 illustrates a cycling performance of GO-S nanocomposite cathode at a constant rate of 0.1 C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17A illustrates a SEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17B illustrates another SEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17C illustrates a TEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17D illustrates another TEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 18C illustrates cycling performance of GO-S nanocomposite cathode at a constant current rate of 0. 1 C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 18D illustrates reversible capacity vs. current density (rate capability) for GO-S nanocomposite cathode. All the cells were cycled in the potential window from 1.0 to 3.0 V according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 19 illustrates cycling performance of a pure GO cathode at a constant rate of 0. 1C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention.
Sulfur Content Wt Pct |
| 66 wt% |
graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Discharge Capacity Initial | 1320 mAh g-1 | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Coulombic Efficiency | 96.4 % | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Discharge Capacity Second Cycle | 1247 mAh g-1 | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Coulombic Efficiency | 97.5 % | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Capacity Retention | 94.5 % | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
C-O stretching vibration | 1751 cm⁻¹ | graphene oxide |
C-OH stretching vibration | 1751 cm⁻¹ | graphene oxide |
C=O stretching vibration (carbonyl/carboxylic groups) | 1751 cm⁻¹ | graphene oxide |
Voltage | 1–3.6 V | — |
Voltage | 1–3 V | — |
— | ≤ 0.01 eV | — |
porous polypropylene separator (Celgard 3501)
n-methyl, n-butyl pyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide
LiTFSI
PEGDME
carbon black
polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF)
aluminum substrate
sulfur
S
Figure 2A illustrates a transmission electron microscope (TEM) bright field (BF) image.
Figure 3B shows the carbon K-edge absorption spectra according to one embodiment.
Figure 4D illustrates reversible capacity vs. current density according to an embodiment.
Figure 6A illustrates a SEM image for pure GO according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 6B illustrates another SEM image for pure GO according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7A illustrates a SEM image of the as-prepared GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7B illustrates another SEM image of the as-prepared GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7C illustrates a TEM image for GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 7D illustrates another TEM image for GO-S nanocomposites before heat treatment according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 8 illustrates X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of GO-S nanocomposites before (a) and after heat treatment in Ar environment for 12h at different temperatures of (b) 155 0 C, and (c) 160 0 C according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 9 illustrates attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) spectra of GO according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 11 illustrates S L-edge soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) spectrum of GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 155 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 12 illustrates fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of (a) GO, and (b) GO-S nanocomposites according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 13 illustrates X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of (a) GO, (b) S element, and (c) GO-S according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 14 illustrates cycling performance of GO-S nanocomposite cathode at a constant rate of 0.05C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention
Figure 16 illustrates a cycling performance of GO-S nanocomposite cathode at a constant rate of 0.1 C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17A illustrates a SEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17B illustrates another SEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17C illustrates a TEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 17D illustrates another TEM image of the as-synthesized GO-S nanocomposites after heat treatment in Ar at 160 ° C for 12 hours according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 18C illustrates cycling performance of GO-S nanocomposite cathode at a constant current rate of 0. 1 C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 18D illustrates reversible capacity vs. current density (rate capability) for GO-S nanocomposite cathode. All the cells were cycled in the potential window from 1.0 to 3.0 V according to an embodiment of the invention.
Figure 19 illustrates cycling performance of a pure GO cathode at a constant rate of 0. 1C after an initial activation processes at 0.02C for 2 cycles according to an embodiment of the invention.
Sulfur Content Wt Pct |
| 66 wt% |
graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Discharge Capacity Initial | 1320 mAh g-1 | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Coulombic Efficiency | 96.4 % | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Discharge Capacity Second Cycle | 1247 mAh g-1 | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Coulombic Efficiency | 97.5 % | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
Capacity Retention | 94.5 % | graphene oxide-sulfur nanocomposite |
C-O stretching vibration | 1751 cm⁻¹ | graphene oxide |
C-OH stretching vibration | 1751 cm⁻¹ | graphene oxide |
C=O stretching vibration (carbonyl/carboxylic groups) | 1751 cm⁻¹ | graphene oxide |
Voltage | 1–3.6 V | — |
Voltage | 1–3 V | — |
— | ≤ 0.01 eV | — |