UNSUPERVISED GAN-BASED INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM USING TEMPORAL CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORKS, SELF-ATTENTION, AND TRANSFORMERS | Matter42 Literature
Patent
Atlas literature
Patent
US 12,634,305 B2
UNSUPERVISED GAN-BASED INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM USING TEMPORAL CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORKS, SELF-ATTENTION, AND TRANSFORMERS
Paulo Freitas De Araujo Filho, Mohamed Naili, Georges Kaddoum, Emmanuel Thepie Fapi et al.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ), Stockholm (SE)·May 19, 2026·US
Drawings
Patent drawings and their descriptions. Click a drawing to enlarge it.
FIG. 1
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a System Deployment Architecture.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a WGAN Training Frame- work.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of GAN Generator and Dis- 35 criminator Architectures.
FIG. 4
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a TCN Block.
FIG. 5
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a Self-Attention Block.
FIG. 6
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a Transformer Block.
FIG. 7
FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method for detecting cyber- 40 attacks at edge servers.
FIG. 8
FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a method for classifying cyber- attacks at a cloud server.
FIG. 9
FIG. 9 is a schematic illustration of an edge server.
FIG. 10
FIG. 10 is a schematic illustration of a virtualization 45 environment in which the different methods, servers and system described herein can be deployed.
Claims
Claims define the patent's legal scope. Independent claims stand alone; dependent claims (nested) narrow them. Click a claim to expand its dependents.
2 independent · 8 dependent
1
IndependentGAN-based anomaly detector at edge server (method)
A method for detecting cyber-attacks at edge servers, comprising: receiving network traffic; extracting and normalizing network flow features from the network traffic to produce a data pattern for evalu-ation; computing an anomaly detection score for the data pattern for evaluation; comparing the anomaly detection score with a threshold and determining if the network traffic corresponds to normal traffic or to an anomaly; upon determining that the network traffic corresponds to an anomaly, mitigating malicious network traffic by triggering a mitigation strategy and sending an anomaly message to an anomaly classifier; retraining the anomaly detector, using federated learning, when triggered by a cloud server running the anomaly classifier upon obtention of new datasets of network traffic; receiving a new training dataset with normal traffic data from the cloud server; retraining a generative adversarial network (GAN) gen-erator neural network and a GAN discriminator neural network of the anomaly detector; periodically sending weights of the neural networks of the generator and discriminator to the cloud server; receiving average generator weights and average dis-criminator weights from the cloud server; updating the weights of the neural networks of the gen-erator and discriminator using the average generator weights and average discriminator weights received from the cloud server, and resuming training; and replacing the current GAN generator neural network and the GAN discriminator neural network with the retrained GAN generator neural network and GAN discriminator neural network.
2
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the generator learns a probabilistic distribution of a training set, enabling produc-tion, by the generator, of data similar to the training set and wherein the discriminator learns how to distinguish between real data and data produced by the generator.
4
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the GAN comprises at least one of each of a temporal convolutional network (TCN) block, a self-attention block, and a transformer block.
5
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the extracting and normalizing network flow features from the network traffic, B₂ comprises extracting and normalizing flow duration, total number of packets, number of flow packets per second, and number of flow bytes per second.
6
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the mitigation strategy is selected among any one or more of temporarily dropping packets, resetting connections, deviating traffic, and notify-ing network hosts.
7
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the anomaly message comprises a geographical location, a timestamp, normalized network flow features, and a computed anomaly detection score value.
8
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the threshold is defined during the training of the GAN and is updated when the GAN is updated.
9
Independentedge server running GAN-based anomaly detector
An edge server running an anomaly detector for detect-ing cyber-attacks comprising processing circuits and a memory, the memory containing instructions executable by the processing circuits whereby the edge server running the anomaly detector is operative to: receive network traffic; extract and normalize network flow features from the network traffic to produce a data pattern for evaluation; compute an anomaly detection score for the data pattern for evaluation; compare the anomaly detection score with a threshold and determine if the network traffic corresponds to normal traffic or to an anomaly; determine that the network traffic corresponds to an anomaly and mitigate malicious network traffic by triggering mitigation strategies and send an anomaly message to an anomaly classifier; retrain the anomaly detector, using federated learning, when triggered by a cloud server running the anomaly classifier upon obtention of new datasets of network traffic; receive a new training dataset with normal traffic data from the cloud server; start retraining a GAN generator neural network and a GAN discriminator neural network of the anomaly detector; periodically send weights of the neural networks of the generator and discriminator to the cloud server; receive average generator weights and average discrimi-nator weights from the cloud server; update the weights of the neural networks of the generator and discriminator using the average generator weights and average discriminator weights received from the cloud server, and resume training; and replace the current GAN generator neural network and the GAN discriminator neural network with the retrained GAN generator neural network and GAN discriminator neural network.
10
Dependent← claim 9
The edge server of claim 9, wherein the edge server is further operative to: receive a validation dataset from the cloud server; and detect anomalies in the received validation dataset and send back a report with an anomaly detection score computed for each of a plurality of data sample of the validation dataset. ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
Device structures
Layer stacks claimed or described, ordered top of device to substrate.
GAN-based anomaly detector at edge server (method)
No layer stack recorded.
edge server running GAN-based anomaly detector
No layer stack recorded.
Cited prior art
Patents and literature cited by this patent (applicant and examiner references).
Cited patents · 8
US 8,418,249 B18,418,249 B1 * 4/2013 Nucci................... G06F 21/552examiner
US 10,956,808 B110,956,808 B1 * 3/2021 Bhardwaj.............. G06N 3/044examiner
US 11,481,637 B211,481,637 B2 * 10/2022 Malaya.................. G06N 3/094examiner
US 11,611,588 B211,611,588 B2 * 3/2023 Vasu................... H04L 63/1425examiner
Patent
Atlas literature
Patent
US 12,634,305 B2
UNSUPERVISED GAN-BASED INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM USING TEMPORAL CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORKS, SELF-ATTENTION, AND TRANSFORMERS
Paulo Freitas De Araujo Filho, Mohamed Naili, Georges Kaddoum, Emmanuel Thepie Fapi et al.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ), Stockholm (SE)·May 19, 2026·US
Drawings
Patent drawings and their descriptions. Click a drawing to enlarge it.
FIG. 1
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a System Deployment Architecture.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a WGAN Training Frame- work.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of GAN Generator and Dis- 35 criminator Architectures.
FIG. 4
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a TCN Block.
FIG. 5
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a Self-Attention Block.
FIG. 6
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a Transformer Block.
FIG. 7
FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method for detecting cyber- 40 attacks at edge servers.
FIG. 8
FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a method for classifying cyber- attacks at a cloud server.
FIG. 9
FIG. 9 is a schematic illustration of an edge server.
FIG. 10
FIG. 10 is a schematic illustration of a virtualization 45 environment in which the different methods, servers and system described herein can be deployed.
Claims
Claims define the patent's legal scope. Independent claims stand alone; dependent claims (nested) narrow them. Click a claim to expand its dependents.
2 independent · 8 dependent
1
IndependentGAN-based anomaly detector at edge server (method)
A method for detecting cyber-attacks at edge servers, comprising: receiving network traffic; extracting and normalizing network flow features from the network traffic to produce a data pattern for evalu-ation; computing an anomaly detection score for the data pattern for evaluation; comparing the anomaly detection score with a threshold and determining if the network traffic corresponds to normal traffic or to an anomaly; upon determining that the network traffic corresponds to an anomaly, mitigating malicious network traffic by triggering a mitigation strategy and sending an anomaly message to an anomaly classifier; retraining the anomaly detector, using federated learning, when triggered by a cloud server running the anomaly classifier upon obtention of new datasets of network traffic; receiving a new training dataset with normal traffic data from the cloud server; retraining a generative adversarial network (GAN) gen-erator neural network and a GAN discriminator neural network of the anomaly detector; periodically sending weights of the neural networks of the generator and discriminator to the cloud server; receiving average generator weights and average dis-criminator weights from the cloud server; updating the weights of the neural networks of the gen-erator and discriminator using the average generator weights and average discriminator weights received from the cloud server, and resuming training; and replacing the current GAN generator neural network and the GAN discriminator neural network with the retrained GAN generator neural network and GAN discriminator neural network.
2
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the generator learns a probabilistic distribution of a training set, enabling produc-tion, by the generator, of data similar to the training set and wherein the discriminator learns how to distinguish between real data and data produced by the generator.
4
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the GAN comprises at least one of each of a temporal convolutional network (TCN) block, a self-attention block, and a transformer block.
5
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the extracting and normalizing network flow features from the network traffic, B₂ comprises extracting and normalizing flow duration, total number of packets, number of flow packets per second, and number of flow bytes per second.
6
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the mitigation strategy is selected among any one or more of temporarily dropping packets, resetting connections, deviating traffic, and notify-ing network hosts.
7
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the anomaly message comprises a geographical location, a timestamp, normalized network flow features, and a computed anomaly detection score value.
8
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the threshold is defined during the training of the GAN and is updated when the GAN is updated.
9
Independentedge server running GAN-based anomaly detector
An edge server running an anomaly detector for detect-ing cyber-attacks comprising processing circuits and a memory, the memory containing instructions executable by the processing circuits whereby the edge server running the anomaly detector is operative to: receive network traffic; extract and normalize network flow features from the network traffic to produce a data pattern for evaluation; compute an anomaly detection score for the data pattern for evaluation; compare the anomaly detection score with a threshold and determine if the network traffic corresponds to normal traffic or to an anomaly; determine that the network traffic corresponds to an anomaly and mitigate malicious network traffic by triggering mitigation strategies and send an anomaly message to an anomaly classifier; retrain the anomaly detector, using federated learning, when triggered by a cloud server running the anomaly classifier upon obtention of new datasets of network traffic; receive a new training dataset with normal traffic data from the cloud server; start retraining a GAN generator neural network and a GAN discriminator neural network of the anomaly detector; periodically send weights of the neural networks of the generator and discriminator to the cloud server; receive average generator weights and average discrimi-nator weights from the cloud server; update the weights of the neural networks of the generator and discriminator using the average generator weights and average discriminator weights received from the cloud server, and resume training; and replace the current GAN generator neural network and the GAN discriminator neural network with the retrained GAN generator neural network and GAN discriminator neural network.
10
Dependent← claim 9
The edge server of claim 9, wherein the edge server is further operative to: receive a validation dataset from the cloud server; and detect anomalies in the received validation dataset and send back a report with an anomaly detection score computed for each of a plurality of data sample of the validation dataset. ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
Device structures
Layer stacks claimed or described, ordered top of device to substrate.
GAN-based anomaly detector at edge server (method)
No layer stack recorded.
edge server running GAN-based anomaly detector
No layer stack recorded.
Cited prior art
Patents and literature cited by this patent (applicant and examiner references).
Cited patents · 8
US 8,418,249 B18,418,249 B1 * 4/2013 Nucci................... G06F 21/552examiner
US 10,956,808 B110,956,808 B1 * 3/2021 Bhardwaj.............. G06N 3/044examiner
US 11,481,637 B211,481,637 B2 * 10/2022 Malaya.................. G06N 3/094examiner
US 11,611,588 B211,611,588 B2 * 3/2023 Vasu................... H04L 63/1425examiner
Patent
Atlas literature
Patent
US 12,634,305 B2
UNSUPERVISED GAN-BASED INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM USING TEMPORAL CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORKS, SELF-ATTENTION, AND TRANSFORMERS
Paulo Freitas De Araujo Filho, Mohamed Naili, Georges Kaddoum, Emmanuel Thepie Fapi et al.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ), Stockholm (SE)·May 19, 2026·US
Drawings
Patent drawings and their descriptions. Click a drawing to enlarge it.
FIG. 1
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a System Deployment Architecture.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a WGAN Training Frame- work.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of GAN Generator and Dis- 35 criminator Architectures.
FIG. 4
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a TCN Block.
FIG. 5
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a Self-Attention Block.
FIG. 6
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a Transformer Block.
FIG. 7
FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method for detecting cyber- 40 attacks at edge servers.
FIG. 8
FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a method for classifying cyber- attacks at a cloud server.
FIG. 9
FIG. 9 is a schematic illustration of an edge server.
FIG. 10
FIG. 10 is a schematic illustration of a virtualization 45 environment in which the different methods, servers and system described herein can be deployed.
Claims
Claims define the patent's legal scope. Independent claims stand alone; dependent claims (nested) narrow them. Click a claim to expand its dependents.
2 independent · 8 dependent
1
IndependentGAN-based anomaly detector at edge server (method)
A method for detecting cyber-attacks at edge servers, comprising: receiving network traffic; extracting and normalizing network flow features from the network traffic to produce a data pattern for evalu-ation; computing an anomaly detection score for the data pattern for evaluation; comparing the anomaly detection score with a threshold and determining if the network traffic corresponds to normal traffic or to an anomaly; upon determining that the network traffic corresponds to an anomaly, mitigating malicious network traffic by triggering a mitigation strategy and sending an anomaly message to an anomaly classifier; retraining the anomaly detector, using federated learning, when triggered by a cloud server running the anomaly classifier upon obtention of new datasets of network traffic; receiving a new training dataset with normal traffic data from the cloud server; retraining a generative adversarial network (GAN) gen-erator neural network and a GAN discriminator neural network of the anomaly detector; periodically sending weights of the neural networks of the generator and discriminator to the cloud server; receiving average generator weights and average dis-criminator weights from the cloud server; updating the weights of the neural networks of the gen-erator and discriminator using the average generator weights and average discriminator weights received from the cloud server, and resuming training; and replacing the current GAN generator neural network and the GAN discriminator neural network with the retrained GAN generator neural network and GAN discriminator neural network.
2
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the generator learns a probabilistic distribution of a training set, enabling produc-tion, by the generator, of data similar to the training set and wherein the discriminator learns how to distinguish between real data and data produced by the generator.
4
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the GAN comprises at least one of each of a temporal convolutional network (TCN) block, a self-attention block, and a transformer block.
5
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the extracting and normalizing network flow features from the network traffic, B₂ comprises extracting and normalizing flow duration, total number of packets, number of flow packets per second, and number of flow bytes per second.
6
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the mitigation strategy is selected among any one or more of temporarily dropping packets, resetting connections, deviating traffic, and notify-ing network hosts.
7
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the anomaly message comprises a geographical location, a timestamp, normalized network flow features, and a computed anomaly detection score value.
8
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the threshold is defined during the training of the GAN and is updated when the GAN is updated.
9
Independentedge server running GAN-based anomaly detector
An edge server running an anomaly detector for detect-ing cyber-attacks comprising processing circuits and a memory, the memory containing instructions executable by the processing circuits whereby the edge server running the anomaly detector is operative to: receive network traffic; extract and normalize network flow features from the network traffic to produce a data pattern for evaluation; compute an anomaly detection score for the data pattern for evaluation; compare the anomaly detection score with a threshold and determine if the network traffic corresponds to normal traffic or to an anomaly; determine that the network traffic corresponds to an anomaly and mitigate malicious network traffic by triggering mitigation strategies and send an anomaly message to an anomaly classifier; retrain the anomaly detector, using federated learning, when triggered by a cloud server running the anomaly classifier upon obtention of new datasets of network traffic; receive a new training dataset with normal traffic data from the cloud server; start retraining a GAN generator neural network and a GAN discriminator neural network of the anomaly detector; periodically send weights of the neural networks of the generator and discriminator to the cloud server; receive average generator weights and average discrimi-nator weights from the cloud server; update the weights of the neural networks of the generator and discriminator using the average generator weights and average discriminator weights received from the cloud server, and resume training; and replace the current GAN generator neural network and the GAN discriminator neural network with the retrained GAN generator neural network and GAN discriminator neural network.
10
Dependent← claim 9
The edge server of claim 9, wherein the edge server is further operative to: receive a validation dataset from the cloud server; and detect anomalies in the received validation dataset and send back a report with an anomaly detection score computed for each of a plurality of data sample of the validation dataset. ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
Device structures
Layer stacks claimed or described, ordered top of device to substrate.
GAN-based anomaly detector at edge server (method)
No layer stack recorded.
edge server running GAN-based anomaly detector
No layer stack recorded.
Cited prior art
Patents and literature cited by this patent (applicant and examiner references).
Cited patents · 8
US 8,418,249 B18,418,249 B1 * 4/2013 Nucci................... G06F 21/552examiner
US 10,956,808 B110,956,808 B1 * 3/2021 Bhardwaj.............. G06N 3/044examiner
US 11,481,637 B211,481,637 B2 * 10/2022 Malaya.................. G06N 3/094examiner
US 11,611,588 B211,611,588 B2 * 3/2023 Vasu................... H04L 63/1425examiner
Patent
Atlas literature
Patent
US 12,634,305 B2
UNSUPERVISED GAN-BASED INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM USING TEMPORAL CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORKS, SELF-ATTENTION, AND TRANSFORMERS
Paulo Freitas De Araujo Filho, Mohamed Naili, Georges Kaddoum, Emmanuel Thepie Fapi et al.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ), Stockholm (SE)·May 19, 2026·US
Drawings
Patent drawings and their descriptions. Click a drawing to enlarge it.
FIG. 1
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a System Deployment Architecture.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a WGAN Training Frame- work.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of GAN Generator and Dis- 35 criminator Architectures.
FIG. 4
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a TCN Block.
FIG. 5
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a Self-Attention Block.
FIG. 6
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a Transformer Block.
FIG. 7
FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method for detecting cyber- 40 attacks at edge servers.
FIG. 8
FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a method for classifying cyber- attacks at a cloud server.
FIG. 9
FIG. 9 is a schematic illustration of an edge server.
FIG. 10
FIG. 10 is a schematic illustration of a virtualization 45 environment in which the different methods, servers and system described herein can be deployed.
Claims
Claims define the patent's legal scope. Independent claims stand alone; dependent claims (nested) narrow them. Click a claim to expand its dependents.
2 independent · 8 dependent
1
IndependentGAN-based anomaly detector at edge server (method)
A method for detecting cyber-attacks at edge servers, comprising: receiving network traffic; extracting and normalizing network flow features from the network traffic to produce a data pattern for evalu-ation; computing an anomaly detection score for the data pattern for evaluation; comparing the anomaly detection score with a threshold and determining if the network traffic corresponds to normal traffic or to an anomaly; upon determining that the network traffic corresponds to an anomaly, mitigating malicious network traffic by triggering a mitigation strategy and sending an anomaly message to an anomaly classifier; retraining the anomaly detector, using federated learning, when triggered by a cloud server running the anomaly classifier upon obtention of new datasets of network traffic; receiving a new training dataset with normal traffic data from the cloud server; retraining a generative adversarial network (GAN) gen-erator neural network and a GAN discriminator neural network of the anomaly detector; periodically sending weights of the neural networks of the generator and discriminator to the cloud server; receiving average generator weights and average dis-criminator weights from the cloud server; updating the weights of the neural networks of the gen-erator and discriminator using the average generator weights and average discriminator weights received from the cloud server, and resuming training; and replacing the current GAN generator neural network and the GAN discriminator neural network with the retrained GAN generator neural network and GAN discriminator neural network.
2
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the generator learns a probabilistic distribution of a training set, enabling produc-tion, by the generator, of data similar to the training set and wherein the discriminator learns how to distinguish between real data and data produced by the generator.
4
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the GAN comprises at least one of each of a temporal convolutional network (TCN) block, a self-attention block, and a transformer block.
5
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the extracting and normalizing network flow features from the network traffic, B₂ comprises extracting and normalizing flow duration, total number of packets, number of flow packets per second, and number of flow bytes per second.
6
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the mitigation strategy is selected among any one or more of temporarily dropping packets, resetting connections, deviating traffic, and notify-ing network hosts.
7
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the anomaly message comprises a geographical location, a timestamp, normalized network flow features, and a computed anomaly detection score value.
8
Dependent← claim 1
The method of claim 1, wherein the threshold is defined during the training of the GAN and is updated when the GAN is updated.
9
Independentedge server running GAN-based anomaly detector
An edge server running an anomaly detector for detect-ing cyber-attacks comprising processing circuits and a memory, the memory containing instructions executable by the processing circuits whereby the edge server running the anomaly detector is operative to: receive network traffic; extract and normalize network flow features from the network traffic to produce a data pattern for evaluation; compute an anomaly detection score for the data pattern for evaluation; compare the anomaly detection score with a threshold and determine if the network traffic corresponds to normal traffic or to an anomaly; determine that the network traffic corresponds to an anomaly and mitigate malicious network traffic by triggering mitigation strategies and send an anomaly message to an anomaly classifier; retrain the anomaly detector, using federated learning, when triggered by a cloud server running the anomaly classifier upon obtention of new datasets of network traffic; receive a new training dataset with normal traffic data from the cloud server; start retraining a GAN generator neural network and a GAN discriminator neural network of the anomaly detector; periodically send weights of the neural networks of the generator and discriminator to the cloud server; receive average generator weights and average discrimi-nator weights from the cloud server; update the weights of the neural networks of the generator and discriminator using the average generator weights and average discriminator weights received from the cloud server, and resume training; and replace the current GAN generator neural network and the GAN discriminator neural network with the retrained GAN generator neural network and GAN discriminator neural network.
10
Dependent← claim 9
The edge server of claim 9, wherein the edge server is further operative to: receive a validation dataset from the cloud server; and detect anomalies in the received validation dataset and send back a report with an anomaly detection score computed for each of a plurality of data sample of the validation dataset. ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
Device structures
Layer stacks claimed or described, ordered top of device to substrate.
GAN-based anomaly detector at edge server (method)
No layer stack recorded.
edge server running GAN-based anomaly detector
No layer stack recorded.
Cited prior art
Patents and literature cited by this patent (applicant and examiner references).
Cited patents · 8
US 8,418,249 B18,418,249 B1 * 4/2013 Nucci................... G06F 21/552examiner
US 10,956,808 B110,956,808 B1 * 3/2021 Bhardwaj.............. G06N 3/044examiner
US 11,481,637 B211,481,637 B2 * 10/2022 Malaya.................. G06N 3/094examiner
US 11,611,588 B211,611,588 B2 * 3/2023 Vasu................... H04L 63/1425examiner
US 11,936,667 B211,936,667 B2 * 3/2024 Salji......................... G06N 7/01examiner
US 11,960,978 B211,960,978 B2 * 4/2024 Crabtree................ G06N 5/022examiner
US 2022/0014554 A12022/0014554 A1 * 1/2022 Vasu....................... H04L 63/20examiner
US 2022/0383071 A12022/0383071 A1 * 12/2022 Sun........................ G06V 10/82examiner
Cited non-patent literature · 6
A. A. Diro et al., Deep Learning: The Frontier for Distributed Attack Detection in Fog-to-Things Computing, IEEE Communications Magazine v Feb. 2018.
A. Creswell et al., Generative Adversarial Networks, Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/MSP.2017.2765202 Date of publication: Jan. 9, 2018. A. Ferdowsi et al., Generative Adversarial Networks for Distributed Intrusion Detection in the Internet of Things, 2019 IEEE. A. Nisioti et al., From Intrusion Detection to Attacker Attribution: A Comprehensive Survey of Unsupervised Methods, IEEE Com- munications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, No. 4, Fourth Quarter 2018. A. Sharma et al., Analysis of Security Data from a Large Computing Organization, 2011 IEEE. A. Vaswani et al., Attention Is All You Need, arXiv:1706.03762v5 [cs.CL] Dec. 6, 2017. D. Ding et al., A survey on security control and attack detection for industrial cyber-physical systems, Neurocomputing vol. 275, Jan. 31, 2018, pp. 1674-1683.10.1109/MSP.2017.2765202
Tensor2Tensor Transformers New Deep Models for NLP. D. Li et al., Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Net- works for Multivariate Time Series, arXiv:1809.04758v3 [cs.LG] Jan. 15, 2019. H. Choi et al., Unsupervised learning approach for network intru- sion detection system using autoencoders, The Journal of Super- computing (2019) 75:5597-5621, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227- 019-02805-w. H. Zenati et al., Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detection, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. I. V. Tetko et al., Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning, ICANN 2019. L. Kaiser et al., “Tensor2Tensor Transformers New Deep Models for NLP”, 2017. M. Abdel-Basset et al: “Semi-Supervised Spatiotemporal Deep Learning for Intrusions Detection in IoT Networks”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, IEEE, USA, vol. 8, No. 15, Feb. 19, 2021. M. Arjovsky et al., “Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks”, Proceedings of the 34th. International Conference on Machine10.1007/s11227
A Machine Learning-based Approach to Build Zero False-Positive IPSs for Industrial IoT and CPS with a Case Study on Power Grids Security. Learning, Sydney, Australia, PMLR 70, 2017. Copyright 2017 by the author(s). M. S. Haghighi et al., “A Machine Learning-based Approach to Build Zero False-Positive IPSs for Industrial IoT and CPS with a Case Study on Power Grids Security”, 0093-9994 (c) 2020 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. 2020. M. Tan et al., “A Neural Attention Model for Real-Time Network Intrusion Detection”, 2019 IEEE. N. Chaabouni et al., “Network Intrusion Detection for IoT Security Based on Learning Techniques”, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, No. 3, Third Quarter 2019. P. Freitas De Araujo-Filho et al: “Intrusion Detection for Cyber- Physical Systems Using Generative Adversarial Networks in Fog Environment”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, IEEE, USA, vol. 8, No. 8, Sep. 18, 2020. P. Freitas et al., Intrusion Detection for Cyber-Physical Systems Using Generative Adversarial Networks in Fog Environment, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, No. 8, Apr. 15, 2021. P. Illy et al., “Securing Fog-to-Things Environment Using Intrusion Detection System Based on Ensemble Learning”, 2019 IEEE Wire- less Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). R. Alguliyev et al., “Cyber-physical systems and their security issues, Computers in Industry”, vol. 100, Sep. 2018, pp. 212-223.
An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling. S. Bai et al., “An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling”, arXiv:1803. 01271v2 [cs.LG], 14 pages, Apr. 19, 2018. S. Han et al., “Intrusion Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems: Techniques and Challenges”, IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 8, No. 4, Dec. 2014. S. Huang et al., “HitAnomaly: Hierarchical Transformers forAnomaly Detection in System Log”, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 17, No. 4, Dec. 2020. S. Prabavathy et al., “Design of Cognitive Fog Computing for Intrusion Detection in Internet of Things”, Journal of Communica- tions and Networks, vol. 20, No. 3, Jun. 2018. S. Y. Ozgumus, “Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detection Using GenerativeAdversarial Networks”, Department of Electronics, Infor- matics and Bioengineering M.Sc. course of Computer Science and Engineering, 2019. S.E. Yi et al., “A Comparison of LSTMs and Attention Mechanisms for Forecasting Financial Time Series”, arXiv:1812.07699v1 [cs. LG] Dec. 18, 2018. T. N. Duc et al., “Convolutional Neural Networks for Continuous QoE Prediction in Video Streaming Services”, Received May 4, 2020, accepted Jun. 11, 2020, date of publication Jun. 22, 2020, date of current version Jul. 2, 2020., vol. 8, 2020. T. Schlegl et al., f-AnoGAN: “Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks”, Medical Image Analysis, vol. 54, May 2019, pp. 30-44.
FlowGuard: An Intelligent Edge Defense Mechanism Against IoT DDoS Attacks. Y. Jia et al., “FlowGuard: An Intelligent Edge Defense Mechanism Against IoT DDoS Attacks”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, No. 10, Oct. 2020. Y. Li et al., “Detecting Anomalies in Intelligent Vehicle Charging and Station Power Supply Systems With Multi-Head Attention Models”, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2021. Y. Yang et al., “A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues in Internet-of-Things”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 2017. International Search Report for PCT/IB2022/055261, mailing date of Sep. 12, 2022, 11 pages.
US 11,936,667 B211,936,667 B2 * 3/2024 Salji......................... G06N 7/01examiner
US 11,960,978 B211,960,978 B2 * 4/2024 Crabtree................ G06N 5/022examiner
US 2022/0014554 A12022/0014554 A1 * 1/2022 Vasu....................... H04L 63/20examiner
US 2022/0383071 A12022/0383071 A1 * 12/2022 Sun........................ G06V 10/82examiner
Cited non-patent literature · 6
A. A. Diro et al., Deep Learning: The Frontier for Distributed Attack Detection in Fog-to-Things Computing, IEEE Communications Magazine v Feb. 2018.
A. Creswell et al., Generative Adversarial Networks, Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/MSP.2017.2765202 Date of publication: Jan. 9, 2018. A. Ferdowsi et al., Generative Adversarial Networks for Distributed Intrusion Detection in the Internet of Things, 2019 IEEE. A. Nisioti et al., From Intrusion Detection to Attacker Attribution: A Comprehensive Survey of Unsupervised Methods, IEEE Com- munications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, No. 4, Fourth Quarter 2018. A. Sharma et al., Analysis of Security Data from a Large Computing Organization, 2011 IEEE. A. Vaswani et al., Attention Is All You Need, arXiv:1706.03762v5 [cs.CL] Dec. 6, 2017. D. Ding et al., A survey on security control and attack detection for industrial cyber-physical systems, Neurocomputing vol. 275, Jan. 31, 2018, pp. 1674-1683.10.1109/MSP.2017.2765202
Tensor2Tensor Transformers New Deep Models for NLP. D. Li et al., Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Net- works for Multivariate Time Series, arXiv:1809.04758v3 [cs.LG] Jan. 15, 2019. H. Choi et al., Unsupervised learning approach for network intru- sion detection system using autoencoders, The Journal of Super- computing (2019) 75:5597-5621, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227- 019-02805-w. H. Zenati et al., Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detection, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. I. V. Tetko et al., Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning, ICANN 2019. L. Kaiser et al., “Tensor2Tensor Transformers New Deep Models for NLP”, 2017. M. Abdel-Basset et al: “Semi-Supervised Spatiotemporal Deep Learning for Intrusions Detection in IoT Networks”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, IEEE, USA, vol. 8, No. 15, Feb. 19, 2021. M. Arjovsky et al., “Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks”, Proceedings of the 34th. International Conference on Machine10.1007/s11227
A Machine Learning-based Approach to Build Zero False-Positive IPSs for Industrial IoT and CPS with a Case Study on Power Grids Security. Learning, Sydney, Australia, PMLR 70, 2017. Copyright 2017 by the author(s). M. S. Haghighi et al., “A Machine Learning-based Approach to Build Zero False-Positive IPSs for Industrial IoT and CPS with a Case Study on Power Grids Security”, 0093-9994 (c) 2020 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. 2020. M. Tan et al., “A Neural Attention Model for Real-Time Network Intrusion Detection”, 2019 IEEE. N. Chaabouni et al., “Network Intrusion Detection for IoT Security Based on Learning Techniques”, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, No. 3, Third Quarter 2019. P. Freitas De Araujo-Filho et al: “Intrusion Detection for Cyber- Physical Systems Using Generative Adversarial Networks in Fog Environment”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, IEEE, USA, vol. 8, No. 8, Sep. 18, 2020. P. Freitas et al., Intrusion Detection for Cyber-Physical Systems Using Generative Adversarial Networks in Fog Environment, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, No. 8, Apr. 15, 2021. P. Illy et al., “Securing Fog-to-Things Environment Using Intrusion Detection System Based on Ensemble Learning”, 2019 IEEE Wire- less Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). R. Alguliyev et al., “Cyber-physical systems and their security issues, Computers in Industry”, vol. 100, Sep. 2018, pp. 212-223.
An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling. S. Bai et al., “An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling”, arXiv:1803. 01271v2 [cs.LG], 14 pages, Apr. 19, 2018. S. Han et al., “Intrusion Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems: Techniques and Challenges”, IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 8, No. 4, Dec. 2014. S. Huang et al., “HitAnomaly: Hierarchical Transformers forAnomaly Detection in System Log”, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 17, No. 4, Dec. 2020. S. Prabavathy et al., “Design of Cognitive Fog Computing for Intrusion Detection in Internet of Things”, Journal of Communica- tions and Networks, vol. 20, No. 3, Jun. 2018. S. Y. Ozgumus, “Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detection Using GenerativeAdversarial Networks”, Department of Electronics, Infor- matics and Bioengineering M.Sc. course of Computer Science and Engineering, 2019. S.E. Yi et al., “A Comparison of LSTMs and Attention Mechanisms for Forecasting Financial Time Series”, arXiv:1812.07699v1 [cs. LG] Dec. 18, 2018. T. N. Duc et al., “Convolutional Neural Networks for Continuous QoE Prediction in Video Streaming Services”, Received May 4, 2020, accepted Jun. 11, 2020, date of publication Jun. 22, 2020, date of current version Jul. 2, 2020., vol. 8, 2020. T. Schlegl et al., f-AnoGAN: “Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks”, Medical Image Analysis, vol. 54, May 2019, pp. 30-44.
FlowGuard: An Intelligent Edge Defense Mechanism Against IoT DDoS Attacks. Y. Jia et al., “FlowGuard: An Intelligent Edge Defense Mechanism Against IoT DDoS Attacks”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, No. 10, Oct. 2020. Y. Li et al., “Detecting Anomalies in Intelligent Vehicle Charging and Station Power Supply Systems With Multi-Head Attention Models”, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2021. Y. Yang et al., “A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues in Internet-of-Things”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 2017. International Search Report for PCT/IB2022/055261, mailing date of Sep. 12, 2022, 11 pages.
US 11,936,667 B211,936,667 B2 * 3/2024 Salji......................... G06N 7/01examiner
US 11,960,978 B211,960,978 B2 * 4/2024 Crabtree................ G06N 5/022examiner
US 2022/0014554 A12022/0014554 A1 * 1/2022 Vasu....................... H04L 63/20examiner
US 2022/0383071 A12022/0383071 A1 * 12/2022 Sun........................ G06V 10/82examiner
Cited non-patent literature · 6
A. A. Diro et al., Deep Learning: The Frontier for Distributed Attack Detection in Fog-to-Things Computing, IEEE Communications Magazine v Feb. 2018.
A. Creswell et al., Generative Adversarial Networks, Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/MSP.2017.2765202 Date of publication: Jan. 9, 2018. A. Ferdowsi et al., Generative Adversarial Networks for Distributed Intrusion Detection in the Internet of Things, 2019 IEEE. A. Nisioti et al., From Intrusion Detection to Attacker Attribution: A Comprehensive Survey of Unsupervised Methods, IEEE Com- munications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, No. 4, Fourth Quarter 2018. A. Sharma et al., Analysis of Security Data from a Large Computing Organization, 2011 IEEE. A. Vaswani et al., Attention Is All You Need, arXiv:1706.03762v5 [cs.CL] Dec. 6, 2017. D. Ding et al., A survey on security control and attack detection for industrial cyber-physical systems, Neurocomputing vol. 275, Jan. 31, 2018, pp. 1674-1683.10.1109/MSP.2017.2765202
Tensor2Tensor Transformers New Deep Models for NLP. D. Li et al., Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Net- works for Multivariate Time Series, arXiv:1809.04758v3 [cs.LG] Jan. 15, 2019. H. Choi et al., Unsupervised learning approach for network intru- sion detection system using autoencoders, The Journal of Super- computing (2019) 75:5597-5621, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227- 019-02805-w. H. Zenati et al., Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detection, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. I. V. Tetko et al., Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning, ICANN 2019. L. Kaiser et al., “Tensor2Tensor Transformers New Deep Models for NLP”, 2017. M. Abdel-Basset et al: “Semi-Supervised Spatiotemporal Deep Learning for Intrusions Detection in IoT Networks”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, IEEE, USA, vol. 8, No. 15, Feb. 19, 2021. M. Arjovsky et al., “Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks”, Proceedings of the 34th. International Conference on Machine10.1007/s11227
A Machine Learning-based Approach to Build Zero False-Positive IPSs for Industrial IoT and CPS with a Case Study on Power Grids Security. Learning, Sydney, Australia, PMLR 70, 2017. Copyright 2017 by the author(s). M. S. Haghighi et al., “A Machine Learning-based Approach to Build Zero False-Positive IPSs for Industrial IoT and CPS with a Case Study on Power Grids Security”, 0093-9994 (c) 2020 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. 2020. M. Tan et al., “A Neural Attention Model for Real-Time Network Intrusion Detection”, 2019 IEEE. N. Chaabouni et al., “Network Intrusion Detection for IoT Security Based on Learning Techniques”, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, No. 3, Third Quarter 2019. P. Freitas De Araujo-Filho et al: “Intrusion Detection for Cyber- Physical Systems Using Generative Adversarial Networks in Fog Environment”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, IEEE, USA, vol. 8, No. 8, Sep. 18, 2020. P. Freitas et al., Intrusion Detection for Cyber-Physical Systems Using Generative Adversarial Networks in Fog Environment, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, No. 8, Apr. 15, 2021. P. Illy et al., “Securing Fog-to-Things Environment Using Intrusion Detection System Based on Ensemble Learning”, 2019 IEEE Wire- less Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). R. Alguliyev et al., “Cyber-physical systems and their security issues, Computers in Industry”, vol. 100, Sep. 2018, pp. 212-223.
An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling. S. Bai et al., “An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling”, arXiv:1803. 01271v2 [cs.LG], 14 pages, Apr. 19, 2018. S. Han et al., “Intrusion Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems: Techniques and Challenges”, IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 8, No. 4, Dec. 2014. S. Huang et al., “HitAnomaly: Hierarchical Transformers forAnomaly Detection in System Log”, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 17, No. 4, Dec. 2020. S. Prabavathy et al., “Design of Cognitive Fog Computing for Intrusion Detection in Internet of Things”, Journal of Communica- tions and Networks, vol. 20, No. 3, Jun. 2018. S. Y. Ozgumus, “Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detection Using GenerativeAdversarial Networks”, Department of Electronics, Infor- matics and Bioengineering M.Sc. course of Computer Science and Engineering, 2019. S.E. Yi et al., “A Comparison of LSTMs and Attention Mechanisms for Forecasting Financial Time Series”, arXiv:1812.07699v1 [cs. LG] Dec. 18, 2018. T. N. Duc et al., “Convolutional Neural Networks for Continuous QoE Prediction in Video Streaming Services”, Received May 4, 2020, accepted Jun. 11, 2020, date of publication Jun. 22, 2020, date of current version Jul. 2, 2020., vol. 8, 2020. T. Schlegl et al., f-AnoGAN: “Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks”, Medical Image Analysis, vol. 54, May 2019, pp. 30-44.
FlowGuard: An Intelligent Edge Defense Mechanism Against IoT DDoS Attacks. Y. Jia et al., “FlowGuard: An Intelligent Edge Defense Mechanism Against IoT DDoS Attacks”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, No. 10, Oct. 2020. Y. Li et al., “Detecting Anomalies in Intelligent Vehicle Charging and Station Power Supply Systems With Multi-Head Attention Models”, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2021. Y. Yang et al., “A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues in Internet-of-Things”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 2017. International Search Report for PCT/IB2022/055261, mailing date of Sep. 12, 2022, 11 pages.
US 11,936,667 B211,936,667 B2 * 3/2024 Salji......................... G06N 7/01examiner
US 11,960,978 B211,960,978 B2 * 4/2024 Crabtree................ G06N 5/022examiner
US 2022/0014554 A12022/0014554 A1 * 1/2022 Vasu....................... H04L 63/20examiner
US 2022/0383071 A12022/0383071 A1 * 12/2022 Sun........................ G06V 10/82examiner
Cited non-patent literature · 6
A. A. Diro et al., Deep Learning: The Frontier for Distributed Attack Detection in Fog-to-Things Computing, IEEE Communications Magazine v Feb. 2018.
A. Creswell et al., Generative Adversarial Networks, Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/MSP.2017.2765202 Date of publication: Jan. 9, 2018. A. Ferdowsi et al., Generative Adversarial Networks for Distributed Intrusion Detection in the Internet of Things, 2019 IEEE. A. Nisioti et al., From Intrusion Detection to Attacker Attribution: A Comprehensive Survey of Unsupervised Methods, IEEE Com- munications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, No. 4, Fourth Quarter 2018. A. Sharma et al., Analysis of Security Data from a Large Computing Organization, 2011 IEEE. A. Vaswani et al., Attention Is All You Need, arXiv:1706.03762v5 [cs.CL] Dec. 6, 2017. D. Ding et al., A survey on security control and attack detection for industrial cyber-physical systems, Neurocomputing vol. 275, Jan. 31, 2018, pp. 1674-1683.10.1109/MSP.2017.2765202
Tensor2Tensor Transformers New Deep Models for NLP. D. Li et al., Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Net- works for Multivariate Time Series, arXiv:1809.04758v3 [cs.LG] Jan. 15, 2019. H. Choi et al., Unsupervised learning approach for network intru- sion detection system using autoencoders, The Journal of Super- computing (2019) 75:5597-5621, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227- 019-02805-w. H. Zenati et al., Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detection, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. I. V. Tetko et al., Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning, ICANN 2019. L. Kaiser et al., “Tensor2Tensor Transformers New Deep Models for NLP”, 2017. M. Abdel-Basset et al: “Semi-Supervised Spatiotemporal Deep Learning for Intrusions Detection in IoT Networks”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, IEEE, USA, vol. 8, No. 15, Feb. 19, 2021. M. Arjovsky et al., “Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks”, Proceedings of the 34th. International Conference on Machine10.1007/s11227
A Machine Learning-based Approach to Build Zero False-Positive IPSs for Industrial IoT and CPS with a Case Study on Power Grids Security. Learning, Sydney, Australia, PMLR 70, 2017. Copyright 2017 by the author(s). M. S. Haghighi et al., “A Machine Learning-based Approach to Build Zero False-Positive IPSs for Industrial IoT and CPS with a Case Study on Power Grids Security”, 0093-9994 (c) 2020 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. 2020. M. Tan et al., “A Neural Attention Model for Real-Time Network Intrusion Detection”, 2019 IEEE. N. Chaabouni et al., “Network Intrusion Detection for IoT Security Based on Learning Techniques”, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, No. 3, Third Quarter 2019. P. Freitas De Araujo-Filho et al: “Intrusion Detection for Cyber- Physical Systems Using Generative Adversarial Networks in Fog Environment”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, IEEE, USA, vol. 8, No. 8, Sep. 18, 2020. P. Freitas et al., Intrusion Detection for Cyber-Physical Systems Using Generative Adversarial Networks in Fog Environment, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, No. 8, Apr. 15, 2021. P. Illy et al., “Securing Fog-to-Things Environment Using Intrusion Detection System Based on Ensemble Learning”, 2019 IEEE Wire- less Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). R. Alguliyev et al., “Cyber-physical systems and their security issues, Computers in Industry”, vol. 100, Sep. 2018, pp. 212-223.
An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling. S. Bai et al., “An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling”, arXiv:1803. 01271v2 [cs.LG], 14 pages, Apr. 19, 2018. S. Han et al., “Intrusion Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems: Techniques and Challenges”, IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 8, No. 4, Dec. 2014. S. Huang et al., “HitAnomaly: Hierarchical Transformers forAnomaly Detection in System Log”, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 17, No. 4, Dec. 2020. S. Prabavathy et al., “Design of Cognitive Fog Computing for Intrusion Detection in Internet of Things”, Journal of Communica- tions and Networks, vol. 20, No. 3, Jun. 2018. S. Y. Ozgumus, “Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detection Using GenerativeAdversarial Networks”, Department of Electronics, Infor- matics and Bioengineering M.Sc. course of Computer Science and Engineering, 2019. S.E. Yi et al., “A Comparison of LSTMs and Attention Mechanisms for Forecasting Financial Time Series”, arXiv:1812.07699v1 [cs. LG] Dec. 18, 2018. T. N. Duc et al., “Convolutional Neural Networks for Continuous QoE Prediction in Video Streaming Services”, Received May 4, 2020, accepted Jun. 11, 2020, date of publication Jun. 22, 2020, date of current version Jul. 2, 2020., vol. 8, 2020. T. Schlegl et al., f-AnoGAN: “Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks”, Medical Image Analysis, vol. 54, May 2019, pp. 30-44.
FlowGuard: An Intelligent Edge Defense Mechanism Against IoT DDoS Attacks. Y. Jia et al., “FlowGuard: An Intelligent Edge Defense Mechanism Against IoT DDoS Attacks”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, No. 10, Oct. 2020. Y. Li et al., “Detecting Anomalies in Intelligent Vehicle Charging and Station Power Supply Systems With Multi-Head Attention Models”, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2021. Y. Yang et al., “A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues in Internet-of-Things”, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 2017. International Search Report for PCT/IB2022/055261, mailing date of Sep. 12, 2022, 11 pages.